The Twin Foxes Estate, Woolmer Green, Herts. Note the two entrance pillars.
(left) Ebenezer Albert Fox (1857 - 1926) and (right) Albert Ebenezer Fox (1857 -
The approach road to a modern housing estate at Woolmer Green, about three miles
south of Stevenage, boasts two proprietorial busts on pedestals of the Fox twins,
Ebenezer Albert and Albert Ebenezer. Only the pattern of lichen on the sculptures
makes the identical twins dissimilar. The estate is called Twin Foxes.
In 1953, a new public house at Rockingham Way, Stevenage opened. It was called The
Twin Foxes (see sign, right).
Who were the Fox twins and why have they been so ‘honoured’?
Ebenezer and Albert were born towards the end of 1857 at Symonds Green, Stevenage.
Their father, Henry (who counted among his ancestors the prominent Hertfordshire
Quaker, George Fox) had a smallholding and their mother was a straw plaiter. Henry
was a God-fearing Baptist and his sons were named after the Ebenezer Chapel on Albert
The twins were so alike that even their parents, in the absence of lichen, resorted
to tying red and blue ribbons to their arms to differentiate between them or seating
them on assigned chairs. However, even in those early days the twins would switch
ribbons and chairs to avoid punishment.
A trawl of the censuses shows Ebenezer living with his brother at St Albans in 1881
but alone at Parkhurst on the Isle of Wight in 1891. His residences though more than
a hundred miles apart had something in common - they were prisons. Then, in 1911,
Ebenezer was recorded as being in a barn a Norton Green Farm, Stevenage. The enumerator
(who was not the person who called at other nearby addresses) was Police Inspector,
The New York Times (yes, their fame spread to America where they also featured in
a Time magazine article) on 9 January 1913 described them as, ‘cheerful little men,
almost bald...63¾ inches in height...with a merry twinkle in their eyes. Their mustaches
are iron gray...there is one point of distinction among them - Ebenezer has the mark
of five cuts to his left wrist; Albert possesses four scars on the right wrist’.
Later reports said that Ebenezer was ‘taciturn and would spend hours in a public
house drinking’ while Albert was ‘a good-natured humourist; a man whose frequent
court appearances meant a “field-day” for all concerned’,
Twentieth century Foxes - poachers
The brothers were incorrigible poachers. They couldn’t help themselves. Between them,
they amassed around two hundred convictions for stealing tame pigeons; assaulting
a gamekeeper; stealing a lamb, stealing potatoes; assaulting police; stealing boots;
using a gun to take game; stealing a coat; stealing trousers; night poaching...and
so the list goes on...and on. Over the decades, they had more than fifty guns confiscated
- flint-stocks, muzzle-loaders and breach-loaders.
One of the Foxes’ guns on display at Hertford Museum
When they were only eleven years old, the Foxes were setting snares and gin traps.
They stole a gun when they were thirteen and when first caught, the magistrates couldn’t
believe the charge brought against boys so young. A month later, they were caught
again but this time disbelief was suspended and they were fined ten shillings. They
then became a two-man crime wave for fifty years. When caught, they served anything
between a day (for shooting a dog) and twelve months (for unlawful wounding) in gaol,
usually being sentenced to hard labour.
Confusion and comedy in court
In February 1907, Albert pleaded guilty to night poaching at Knebworth, Herts. The
prosecutor said that it was sometimes very difficult to distinguish between them.
The magistrate drolly commented, ‘Especially if there is an alibi’ (Laughter) While
sentencing Albert to six months hard labour, he commented, ‘Fox, you possess strong
sporting instincts and it is therefore difficult for me to feel angry with you. I
am told you were born of very respectable parents....you learnt the use of a gun
when you were quite young and have used it ever since to shoot other people’s pheasants
and rabbits. Do try and turn over a new leaf and be an honest man’.
Six years later, in January 1913, Ebenezer applied to Hitchin magistrates for compensation
for wrongful conviction after being sent to prison for seven days. While there, Albert
admitted that he was actually the offender. No compensation was offered – what may
have swayed the Court’s decision was that exactly the opposite had happened a short
time ago when Albert was imprisoned for a month and it was Ebenezer who had committed
Ebenezer was charged in 1917 with stealing five fowls, valued at twenty shillings
from Frederick Reynolds at Langley Hill Farm, near Preston. He pleaded ‘Not Guilty’,
claiming he found the fowls. The constable who arrested Fox was asked why he suspected
Ebenezer. ‘Well Sir, you know his character as well as I do and seeing his pockets
so bulky, I suspected him’ (Laughter). Ebenezer retorted, ‘None ‘o that! I have got
as good a character as you have in Stevenage (Laughter) ‘Did I tell you I stole the
fowls? Constable, ‘Yes’. Fox (with vehemence) ‘You’re a liar and I tell it to your
face in Court (Laughter) I don’t want to speak to you again for I’ve been sent to
prison by better men than you’ (Laughter) He also claimed that a few days earlier
he had been shooting with the Earl of Strathmore. None of this saved Ebenezer from
a prison sentence of six weeks.
During the cross examination of a keeper or constable, they were asked, ‘Have a good
look at me. And now have another look at my brother who is in court....let the gentleman
see your pretty face. Remember you are on your oath. Don’t you go and commit perjury
like you did last time. Now will you swear it was me and not that brother of mine
you stopped on that black night?. A hesitation...and the case was lost.
In court, the twins affected an air of injured innocence - the information, the summons,
the evidence - it was all one gigantic fabrication - they just weren’t there. They
extracted the maximum benefit from being identical – especially when in court. One
would provide an alibi for the other or they would claim the wrong brother had been
arrested. This created memorable repartee for the watching public.
The Fox twins are standing in the right foreground
But not all magistrates joined in the fun. In September 1913 at Stevenage Sessions,
Albert was hauled before an obviously exasperated Mr C Poyntz Stewart who exploded:
‘Fox. I am not going to waste more than a few words of my breath upon you. You seem
to glory in your shame and delight – a miserable creature – in being a miserable
celebrity. You ought to have the full maximum. You have had 94 previous convictions
and this is the ninety-fifth - over half of which are for poaching and offences against
the Game Laws. This is nothing less than common stealing. You have descended to become
a common thief and there is no sport about that’. After giving Albert ‘both barrels’,
he was fined a paltry £2.
In 1900, Albert was summoned by the Prince of Wales (the future King Edward VII)
to the Marquis of Lorne Hotel at Stevenage and drank beer with him there. Edward
joked to a flunkey, ‘Here is a man who can shoot more birds in the moonlight than
you can in the daytime’. Albert extracted maximum mileage from this encounter saying
on one occasion before magistrates that he could get a very good reference as he
went shooting with his Majesty the King and hoping his sentence would not be too
long as he was ‘supposed to go shooting with His Majesty this year’. This cut no
ice with the Chairman who sentenced both brothers to a month with hard labour.
The Fox Twins building one of their future temporary dens - Stanmore Road,
Stevenage Police Station in 1915
Fingerprinting and the Foxes
An advance in criminal forensic science can be attributed in part to the ‘Fox Twins’.
In 1904, criminology took a step forward with the discovery that everyone’s fingerprints
were unique – even identical twins, despite sharing the same DNA. The reason for
this is that babies occupy different corners of the womb. This causes differences
in the ridging of their skin and their fingerprints. As a result ‘the detailed minutiae
of where skin ridges meet, end or bifuscate are different’.
The then Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Edward Henry, was partly motivated
by the continual humiliation of Hertfordshire’s authorities by the twins to prove
that this new science was viable. The Fox twins were among the first criminals to
be convicted using paw prints. Thirty years later, their example was still being
quoted in court to give substance to the credibility of fingerprint evidence.
The Fox Twins and Preston
Capture of the Foxes
Albert and Ebenezer Fox of Stevenage were charged with night poaching at Hitchwood,
near Preston, on the night of 1 January 1901. George Arnold was called, under-keeper
in the employ of Mr Bailey Hawkins who stated that at about 00.30 he heard a shot
fired at the top of Hitchwood. He went in the direction from which the shot was fired
and then heard other shots. Whilst in the wood he heard voices and two men came within
twenty yards of him. He rushed forward and the men ran away. He followed for about
two hundred yards and then the men fell upon the ground. He caught the defendant,
Albert, and the other defendant ran away in the direction of Preston. Arnold led
Albert about four hundred yards to the road and there searched him, but found nothing
upon him. The man who ran away was Ebenezer Fox. He noticed as he was running that
he had a gun with him and that his pockets were bulging. George Arnold, an uncle
was also called to prove that he heard shots fired. Sentence: imprisonment at St
Albans gaol for two months with hard labour.
Perhaps it was on this occasion (or maybe another) that Ebenezer was caught at Hitchwood.
He hid his gun and bag. When he was asked by the magistrate why he in the wood, he
replied, ‘Listen to me Muster Radcliffe. I’ve always told you the truth and what’s
more I always will. I went into the wood that night because I wanted to meditate
upon the Baptist Hymn Book. And that’s the truth, the Bible truth and nothing but
the truth’. Whereupon he produced it in court with a flourish and a cloud of feathers’.
There is a geocache featuring the Fox Twins at Hitchwood. The hint is: Vs n tbbfr
pna ynl tbyqra rttf haqre n tbbfroreel ohfu, jung ynlf checyr rfft? Should you be
inclined to spend a pleasant hour or so searching for the cache, please observe the
The end of the Foxes
Ebenezer (above) was the first twin to go. ’It was all due to the keepers who knocked
him about the head. It was their doing that he became deaf and couldn’t any longer
hear his birds drop’. In Hitchin Infirmary, he grew listless and disinclined to turn
out at nights. Knowing his hours were numbered, he absconded to get back home. His
legs gave out at The Willows - a piece of woodland at St Ippollitts. He was found
unconscious under bushes three days later. Ironically for the Foxes, a few years
earlier in 1918, commenting on the lack of an address when a compensation claim was
made, the assistant overseer described their home as ‘a couple of hurdles and a little
bracken’. Ebenezer died from exhaustion and exposure on 2 October 1926 in Hitchin
On 20 May 1937, Albert also died at Hitchin Workhouse, aged 79. The only mourners
at his funeral were Lady Fellowes and Hitchin historian, Reginald Hine. They left
a wreath of irises.
With this background to the naming of the Woolmer Green Twin Foxes estate, perhaps
its residents are especially vigilant when locking doors and windows and installing
burglar alarms. You really can’t trust a bust!
Ebenezer was buried at St Nicholas, Stevenage. Old friends, magistrates, keepers,
constables, ‘coney-catchers’, poulterers, Baptists and a crowd of commoner people
saw him off. Albert, being out of funds, made a bunch of wild flowers which he dropped
into his brother’s grave.